Unfortunately, the marijuana post-accident positivity data published in the DTI indicates that not monitoring a workforce for the presence of the drug can potentially have negative impacts on finances and employee productivity. According to the findings from a study conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago and the National Safety Council (NSC), each substance-abusing employee costs their company an average of $8,817 annually.4
Exemptions Apply in Both States
The new laws in Washington and California contain exemptions for certain occupations. For instance, in California the construction industry is mostly exempt, which means construction companies can continue to make employment decisions on employees and applicants based on the presence of the non-psychoactive metabolite(s) of marijuana in urine and/or hair specimens. In Washington there is a list of exempt occupations which can be found in the SB5123 statute. Also the new Washington law only applies to pre-employment testing. This means that employers in Washington can continue to conduct random, post-accident, and reasonable suspicion tests with urine and/or hair to detect the non-psychoactive metabolite(s) of marijuana.
These laws do not apply to employers who are performing drug testing under federally mandated regulations. For example, the drug and alcohol testing regulations of the US Department of Transportation (DOT) currently require employers to conduct urine tests.
Oral fluid testing
The bottom line for employers in California and Washington is that oral fluid testing provides another option to test for marijuana.
Both the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (in October 2019) and the US Department of Transportation (in May 2023) have issued final regulations for laboratory-based oral fluid testing. One of the reasons these federal agencies chose to endorse oral fluid testing is because “The scientific basis for the use of oral fluid as an alternative specimen for drug testing has now been broadly established and the advances in the use of oral fluid in detecting drugs have made it possible for this alternative specimen to be used in federal programs with the same level of confidence that has been applied to the use of urine.”5
Generally speaking, oral fluid specimens are easier to collect than other methods, can be collected nearly anywhere and at any time, and do not necessarily require the services of a professional technician. Because a private bathroom stall is not required, each oral fluid collection is observed, which eliminates the potential use of subversion products available on the market today.
Instant oral fluid testing, which is not permitted for federal drug testing, but permitted in both California and Washington, makes same day hiring a possibility for companies struggling to find qualified workers and would prefer to continue screening applicants for marijuana before making a final hiring decision.
Conclusion
“This is a challenging time for employers in California and Washington, as well as any other states that may be considering similar legislation,” Dr. Harwani cautioned. “Marijuana use is increasing, and, expectedly so, we are seeing a corresponding increase in positive drug test results for marijuana. Employers need to understand their options in drug testing, and should consider all possible drug testing matrices (e.g., urine, oral fluid, hair, breath, etc.) that allow employers to comply with applicable laws while continuing to create a safe workplace.”
One thing is clear, while state laws will continue to evolve, drug use trends are consistent, and employers are tasked with navigating these variables to maintain a safe, productive, and healthy workforce. Understanding your options as an employer and evaluating your drug testing policy should be a top priority.
To learn more about solutions and to connect with a subject matter expert, visit our website or connect with us online.