Multiple factors affect the plasma concentration of VWF. A major contributor is blood group. On average, levels are lower in blood group O individuals compared to non–blood group O individuals. Why the difference? The blood group A and B alleles encode glycosyltransferases that add carbohydrate moieties to the precursor side chains, converting them to the A or B antigens. The O alleles do not encode this transferase and thus express the unmodified precursor. VWF undergoes glycosylation, and the ABO carbohydrate structures have been identified within the A1 domain of the protein. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, one hypothesis is that the reduced level of glycosylated VWF in individuals with blood group O is associated with decreased survival of the protein.4
Factors associated with higher VWF levels include race (15% higher in African Americans)*, chronic inflammation, acute infection/trauma, pregnancy, oral estrogen replacement, use of oral contraceptives, age (higher in neonates), diabetes, malignancy, stress, surgery, and exercise. A factor associated with reduced VWF level is hypothyroidism. Furthermore, female patients experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding will also have higher VWF levels which can mask the diagnosis of VWD.5 A recent ASH publication on when and how to test for VWD patients with heavy menstrual bleeding has been published.6 The key recommendation is that testing be repeated at baseline during a period of wellness when heavy menstrual bleeding is not occurring if VWF values are between 50% and 100%.6
In addition, VWF levels may be decreased with the use of ristocetin-based VWF activity assays in patients with the nonpathological VWF polymorphism DH1472H. Studies have shown that patients with this polymorphism can have decreased ristocetin-based VWF activity by approximately 10% to 30%, with the decrease dependent on whether the patient is heterozygous or homozygous for this polymorphism. This polymorphism is seen in 60% to 70% of patients of African origin and 15% to 20% in the Caucasian population.7 This can lead to misclassification as to whether a patient has VWD and/or the type of VWD.6 Currently, the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, suggests that VWF assays use non–ristocetin-based activity assays for the evaluation of VWD such as von Willebrand Factor GP1bM activity (VWF:GPIbM, test code 13995).2
*There is insufficient research evidence to support disease associations by race; these differences are more likely due to social determinants.