Extrinsic
- Drug-drug interactions
- Compliance
- Smoking
- Environmental
- Diet
- Alcohol use
- Other
With the increasing trends of prescription drug use and polypharmacy in the US,1,2 prescription decisions continue to be a major aspect of the primary care provider role.
While trial-and-error and titration (adjusting medication to find the optimal dose) have been the standard approach to choosing and prescribing drugs, it is by definition an inexact process. Medications are typically developed, marketed, and prescribed based on data generated from clinical trials, approved by the US FDA. Approvals are usually a compilation of the data to determine the use of the medication in an average patient. However, no two patients are alike—and the “error” aspect of a trial-and-error prescribing strategy may result in a negative outcome.
Advances in genetic testing provide tools—such as pharmacogenomics (PGx)—to determine whether a patient’s genetic profile may affect the efficacy and side-effect profile of a particular medication.
This personalized information can help clinicians tailor therapies to support safer, more effective prescribing decisions. Due to their role in prescribing medications, primary care providers are in a position to help patients benefit from the information yielded through PGx testing.3
In this article:
Clinical challenge | Why it matters | Ordering recommendations | Interpreting test results | Next steps | Supporting resources
In recent years, total prescription medicine use in the US has increased, reaching 210 billion days of therapy in 2025.1 Recent data show that 68% of Americans report taking at least one prescription medication daily.2
In addition, polypharmacy is increasing significantly,4 with 26% of US adults reporting they take 4+ prescriptions per day.2
Polypharmacy can be especially elevated in people with chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes.4 In addition, mental health and polypharmacy tend to be closely linked, because psychiatric medications—in many cases prescribed as multi-drug regimens—are often added to treatments for chronic illness.5
Pharmaceutical companies design standard doses and formulations that are statistically safe and effective for a broad population—relying on clinicians to use labeling and dose variations to adjust for individual responses to a drug.
As a result, many patients on the same prescription drug may experience less efficacy or more side effects [Figure 1].6
For patients taking multiple medications, this variability is multiplied, increasing the potential likelihood of adverse drug events.7
When prescribing drugs, it’s important to consider all factors, both extrinsic and intrinsic:
Extrinsic
Intrinsic
The intrinsic factor of genetics provides the opportunity to add valuable individualized information to a patient’s clinical profile. This makes it a significant factor to consider—preemptively—when making prescription decisions.
A recent study found that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for an estimated 5% of hospital admissions.8
Additionally, the high incidence of polypharmacy can lead to an increased risk of adverse drug interactions (ADIs).5 This underscores the need for medication strategies more precise than trial-and-error prescribing and titration.
PGx testing utilizes patient-specific genomic markers to assist clinicians in the selection of medications with the highest likelihood of success while minimizing the risk of toxicity.
Research has shown that PGx testing can reduce the risk of ADRs, with a recent European study finding that PGx-guided dosing can reduce ADRs by 30%.9
In fact, PGx guideline recommendations are available for many of the drugs often implicated in ADRs, including warfarin, antiplatelet agents, and opioid analgesics.10, 11
In addition, PGx guidelines are available for several drugs and drug categories commonly used in primary care, including certain antidepressants, statins, analgesics, antibiotics, and contraceptives.10
Pharmacogenetics presents an opportunity for safer and more efficient pharmacotherapy—minimizing trial-and-error prescribing and supporting better outcomes.12
Examples include:
HIV – Abacavir is indicated for HIV infection treatment and used as part of some highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens. However, patients with the HLA-B*57:01 allele are at risk for severe, potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions.14
To reduce the risk of these adverse reactions, drug labeling for abacavir recommends that all patients should be screened for the HLA-B*57:01 allele before initiating or reinitiating abacavir, unless the patient has been previously tested.14
Cardiology – In a large-scale national clinical study, genotype-guided dosing of warfarin reduced the rate of hospitalizations by 31% in outpatients initiating warfarin.15
Oncology – Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy is a frequently prescribed class of anticancer drugs. A prospective study reported that genotype-guided dosing of the fluoropyrimidine therapy was associated with significantly reduced toxicity, risk of drug-induced death, and treatment costs.16
Because PGx testing analyzes germline DNA, the results remain valid for life.17 As medication regimens evolve, the information provided can support safer prescribing decisions at every stage of care. Combined with clinical judgment and patient-specific factors (eg, age, comorbidities, or concurrent therapies), PGx testing provides a foundation for more informed, personalized treatment.
Quest offers 2 PGx panels to analyze 21 genes tied to clinically actionable gene-drug associations, supported by evidence from expert groups like the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and ClinPGx.
While both panels analyze the same 21 genes, each produces a different reporting structure:
Pharmacogenomics Panel
Pharmacogenomics Panel with Coriell Life Sciences
* For medication-specific guidance based on these findings, test code 14271 (Pharmacogenomics Panel with medication guidance from Coriell) includes access to a Coriell Life Sciences enhanced report that incorporates drug-gene interaction guidance from curated sources such as CPIC®. Quest does not review or validate Coriell reports. These are developed independently by Coriell's professional staff. Test code 14272 (Pharmacogenomics Panel) does not contain this guidance from Coriell.
These PGx panels can help inform decisions across a broad range of clinical areas in a single test.
PGx testing provides insight into whether a patient is a normal, poor, intermediate, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer. These panels can provide helpful information to guide drug-related decisions such as selection and dosage in treatment contexts including
Pharmacogenomics panels analyze genes tied to clinically actionable, high-evidence gene-drug associations.
Note: When test code 14271 (Pharmacogenomics Panel with medication guidance from Coriell) is ordered, a link to obtain a comprehensive gene-drug interaction report from Coriell Life Sciences will be available at no additional cost. Information provided by Coriell may be updated as new information becomes available. Providers can access updated information through the provided link using Coriell’s GeneDose live software. If test code 14271 (Pharmacogenomics Panel with medication guidance from Coriell) is not ordered, no link will be available. It will not be possible to obtain medication guidance from Coriell at a later date after results for 14272 Pharmacogenomics Panel without medication guidance are provided. In such a case, the ordering HCP must determine the PGx effects through other sources of information.
Results across both pharmacogenomics panels include genotype (diplotype) and predicted phenotypes.
This result indicates that a patient is likely to break down medications through this genetic pathway normally and thus is likely to achieve expected drug response at standard doses.
Patients with IM or PM results may metabolize some medications more slowly than NM patients and may experience reduced effectiveness or unwanted side effects.
RM or UM results suggest a patient may process drugs more quickly, which can reduce therapeutic efficacy or increase side effects.
In addition to genes that code for drug-metabolizing enzymes, the panels include other genes that may influence medication response.
After receiving PGx panel results, recommendations include reviewing the patient’s current medication list, interpreting the genes with actionable prescribing guidance, and adjusting or avoiding medications in alignment with clinically relevant findings.18
Implementing changes based on panel results can also involve a pharmacist and/or genomics specialist when possible.
Reach out to receive additional information on Quest’s drug monitoring lab tests, services, and coverage.
The CPT® codes provided are based on American Medical Association guidelines and are for informational purposes only. CPT coding is the sole responsibility of the billing party. Please direct any questions regarding coding to the payer being billed.
References
1. IQVIA. U.S. medicine use trends 2026. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. Published April 27, 2026. Accessed June 1, 2026. https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports-and-publications/reports/us-medicine-use-trends-2026
2. CivicScience. Trend to watch: the percentage of Americans taking four or more prescription medications daily continues to rise. Published 2024. Accessed June 1, 2026. https://civicscience.com/trend-to-watch-the-percentage-of-americans-taking-four-or-more-prescription-medications-daily-continues-to-rise/
3. Hayward J, McDermott J, Qureshi N, et al. Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary care: a structured review of implementation models. Pharmacogenomics. 2021 Aug;22(12):761-776. doi:10.2217/pgs-2021-0032
4. Wang X, Liu K, Shirai K, et al. Prevalence and trends of polypharmacy in U.S. adults, 1999-2018. Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Jul 12;8(1):25. doi:10.1186/s41256-023-00311-4
5. Longo F. Managing polypharmacy in individuals with anxiety and/or depression. Behavioral Health News. Published September 29, 2025. Accessed June 1, 2026. https://behavioralhealthnews.org/managing-polypharmacy-in-individuals-with-anxiety-and-or-depression/
6. Spear BB, Heath-Chiozzi M, Huff J. Clinical application of pharmacogenetics. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7(5):201-204. doi:10.1016/s1471-4914(01)01986-4
7. Cleveland Clinic. Polypharmacy. Updated December 1, 2025. Accessed June 1, 2026. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/polypharmacy
8. Komagamine J. Prevalence of urgent hospitalizations caused by adverse drug reactions: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 13;14(1):6058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56855-z
9. Swen JJ, van der Wouden CH, Manson LE, et al. A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study. Lancet. 2023;401(10374):347-356. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01841-4
10. Rollinson V, Turner R, Pirmohamed M. Pharmacogenomics for primary care: an overview. Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;11(11):1337. doi: 10.3390/genes11111337
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations. Reviewed October 26, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/precision-medicine/table-pharmacogenetic-associations
12. Ingelman-Sundberg M. Pharmacogenetics: an opportunity for a safer and more efficient pharmacotherapy. J. Intern. Med. 2001;250(3):186-200. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00879.x
13. Chanfreau-Coffinier C, Hull LE, Lynch JA, et al. Projected prevalence of actionable pharmacogenetic variants and level A drugs prescribed among US Veterans Health Administration pharmacy users. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e195345. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5345
14. Dean L. Abacavir therapy and HLA-B*57:01 genotype. In: Pratt V, McLeod H, Rubinstein W, et al, eds. Medical Genetics Summaries. Bethesda (MD); 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK315783/
15. Epstein RS, Moyer TP, Aubert RE, et al. Warfarin genotyping reduces hospitalization rates results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2804-2812. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.009
16. Deenen MJ, Meulendijks D, Cats A, et al. Upfront genotyping of DPYD*2A to individualize fluoropyrimidine therapy: a safety and cost analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:227-234. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1325
17. Verbelen M, Weale ME, Lewis CM. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: are we there yet? Pharmacogenomics J. 2017;17(4):301-312. doi:10.1038/tpj.2016.11
18. Weitzel KW, Duong BQ, Arwood MJ, et al. A stepwise approach to implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the primary care setting. Pharmacogenomics. 2019 Oct;20(15):1103-1112. doi:10.2217/pgs-2019-0053