Clinical trial timelines and enrollment performance are heavily influenced by the quality of the data guiding decisions and the recruitment strategies used to engage high-value patients. Relying on inaccurate data and ineffective recruitment strategies often leads to underperforming sites, slow enrollment, and costly trial delays. Combining definitive diagnostic lab data with a targeted, data-driven recruitment approach is essential to confidently optimize site selection and drive trial enrollment.

Explore these resources to learn:

• How lab data compares to other data sources and why it is the premier choice to guide site decisions
• The strengths and weaknesses of common recruitment channels, and how a targeted, data-driven approach drives enrollment
• How Quest and our recruitment solutions help maximize clinical trial success

Data analysis: The value of lab data in identifying optimal sites for clinical trials

View the analysis to see why claims may fall short in identifying which sites to activate for a clinical trial and how leveraging real-world lab data provides the definitive insights needed to pinpoint where eligible patient populations are.

The Quest advantage in clinical trial recruitment

See how Quest’s recruitment solution compares to common recruitment tactics like social media and why a targeted, data-driven approach maximizes conversion throughout the enrollment process.

How lab data helps inform site strategies for clinical trials

See the benefits of utilizing real-world lab data in site strategies.

When it’s time to shift your recruitment strategies to a more targeted, data-driven approach

Is your recruitment mix targeted and precise enough to find the patients that are right for your trial? Evaluate where your recruitment channels fall on the precision wheel and when you may need to consider a more targeted approach.

How real-world lab data compares to claims and EHR data

Explore the key characteristics of different real-world data (RWD) sources to help you assess what you are currently using and what you may be missing to drive maximum impact for your trials.

How common recruitment channels stack up against each other

Compare the strengths and weaknesses of common recruitment methods, helping you assess whether your current mix is truly optimized to meet your enrollment goals and connect your therapy with the patients who need it most.