
|
|
|
Introducing Amplified Chlamydia Testing from a Urine Specimen |
|
Chlamydia screening that's more conclusive, less intrusive |
A Non-Invasive Collection Method Featuring:
| |
Convenience of a urine specimen more likely to be accepted by men, women and adolescent patients |
| |
High sensitivity as much as 30% more sensitive than non-amplified screening tests1 |
| |
CDC recognition amplified testing is the preferred method for the detection of chlamydia2 |
Over 3 Million Sexually Active Men, Women and Adolescents Will Become Infected with Chlamydia This Year.1 Help Reverse this Trend with Routine Annual Screening.
| |
CDC recommended - the latest CDC guidelines state that all sexually active people at high risk should be screened annually for STDs |
| |
Amplified testing - available in a range of collection options, Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing offers increased sensitivity and specificity, resulting in fewer false negatives |
50% of Men with Chlamydia are Asymptomatic.3
| |
Untreated chlamydia in men typically causes urethral infection, but may also result in prostatitis, urethral scarring, infertility or epididymitis |
| |
According to the CDC, successful infection testing programs should include comprehensive screening and treatment for women as well as for men4 |
75% of Women with Chlamydia are Asymptomatic.3
| |
Up to 40% of women with untreated chlamydia will develop pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which is the critical link to infertility and potentially fatal tubal pregnancy4 |
| |
CDC guidelines recommend annual screening for high-risk patients and rescreening of women treated for chlamydia infection due to the increased risk of reinfection2 |
Online Resources for Healthcare Professionals
Online Information for Your Patients
Your patients can learn about health conditions and laboratory tests in our Patient Health Library.
Contact a Quest Diagnostics Sales Representative,
learn more about our testing services, and become a client
References
1 Black, Carolyn M. "Current Methods of Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections," Clin Microbiol Rev, Jan 1997, p 160-184.
2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines 2002, MMWR 2002, 51 (No. RR-6).
3 Honey et al. Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies, Sex Transm Infect, 2002, p 406-412.
4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fact Sheet, Chlamydia in the United States, April 2001.
< Back to previous page
|
|