|
|
|
Integrated Screen
Including the Integrated, Serum Integrated, and Sequential Integrated
Screens
|
|
|
Test Summary |
|
|
|
Prenatal screening
is routinely offered for Down syndrome and NTDs and is accompanied by a risk
assessment for trisomy 18. Screening for NTDs is based on alpha-fetoprotein
(AFP) alone, whereas Down syndrome and trisomy 18 risk assessments are based
on multiple marker combinations that include maternal age and 2 or more of the
following: pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), nuchal translucency
(NT), AFP, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), unconjugated estriol (uE3), and
dimeric inhibin A (DIA).1-4
While screening
has previously been offered in either the first or second trimester, the
introduction of integrated screening that combines the results of markers
measured in both the first and second trimesters has increased the detection
rate (DR) for Down syndrome while lowering the number of false positives, thus
reducing the necessity for invasive testing (ie, chorionic villus sampling
[CVS], amniocentesis).1,5,6 Separate
screening tests in both trimesters, however, is not recommended due to a
higher overall false-positive rate (FPR).1
There are a number
of approaches to integrated screening (Table).
One is the Integrated Screen that combines the results of NT and PAPP-A
measured in the first trimester with additional markers measured in the second
trimester. Patient-specific risks are reported only after all markers have
been measured. The Serum Integrated Screen is the same as the Integrated
Screen, except NT measurement is not used. Though the Serum Integrated Screen has a lower detection
rate than the Integrated Screen, it is the test of choice when an accurate NT
measurement is not available.1
Another approach
is the Sequential Integrated Screen in which NT, PAPP-A, and hCG are measured
in the first trimester (part 1 of the test). If risk positive for Down
syndrome or trisomy 18, the risks are reported and the patient can be referred
immediately for diagnostic testing. Note, however, that such patients will not
receive a NTD screen result because they do not undergo second trimester
screening (part 2 of the test). When first trimester results are negative,
risks are not reported after part 1; rather, the concentration of additional
markers are measured in the second trimester. When this second part of
the test is complete, markers from part 1 and part 2 are combined to provide
risk estimates for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. AFP is used to report NTD
risk. Thus, the Sequential Integrated Screen enables earlier diagnosis for
patients with a first trimester elevated risk while maintaining a high
detection rate.1 |
|
|
|
Table. Comparison of the Integrated Prenatal Screening Tests |
|
Test |
Sampling Time
(Weeks' Gestation) |
Markers Included |
Results Reported |
Down Syndrome
DR, % |
Trisomy 18 DR, %7 |
Open Spina Bifida DR, %
(1-3% FPR)2 |
|
Integrated Screen |
|
Risk reported after
part 2 |
92
(3%
FPR)8 |
~90a |
65-80 |
|
Part 1 |
9.0-13.9b |
PAPP-A, NT |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Part 2 |
15.0-22.9c |
AFP, hCG,
uE3, DIA |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Serum Integrated Screen
|
Risk reported after
part 2 |
88
(6%
FPR)8 |
~90a |
65-80 |
|
Part 1 |
9.0-13.9 |
PAPP-A |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Part 2 |
15.0-22.9c |
AFP, hCG,
uE3, DIA |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Sequential Integrated Screen |
Elevated risks reported after
part 1. Patients offered diagnostic testing. Patients with normal risk proceed to part 2. All risks reported
after part
2. |
92
(4%
FPR)9 |
~90a |
65-80 |
|
Part 1 Part 2 |
10.0-13.9 15.0-22.9c |
PAPP-A
hCG, NT
AFP, hCG,
uE3, DIA |
NA NA |
NA NA |
NA NA |
|
DR, detection rate; FPR, false positive rate;
PAPP-A, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; NT, nuchal translucency;
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; uE3,
unconjugated estriol; DIA, dimeric inhibin A; NA, not applicable.
a
FPR equals the Down syndrome FPR plus 0.1%.
b
Blood samples are accepted from 9.0 weeks gestation; however, NT
measurement must be performed from 10.0 to 13.9 weeks gestation.
c
The best time for sample collection for part 2 is 16 to 18 weeks; however,
samples collected from 14 to 22.9 weeks are accepted. Open neural tube
defect risk may not be available for samples collected before 15 weeks’
gestation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1: 2 mL
refrigerated serum; 1 mL minimum
Part 2: 3 mL refrigerated serum; 1 mL minimum
Provide maternal
date of birth, expected date of delivery, maternal weight (lb) at time of
sample collection, race, insulin-dependent diabetes status, number of
fetuses, NT measurement (mm) as determined by a currently certified
ultrasonographer at time of sample collection, ultrasonographer’s
certification number, and sample collection date. Individual
ultrasonographer NT data will be submitted to the certifying agency (FMF or
NTQR).
Gestational age
determined by ultrasound is preferred; however, last menstrual period
(LMP)-based gestational age is accepted for the serum integrated screen.
Unacceptable:
samples from women carrying more than 2 fetuses (triplets, etc). |
|
PAPP-A, AFP, hCG, uE3, DIA: marker-specific immunoassays
Multiple of the median (MoM): calculated for all markers, except maternal
age; race-specific medians used for PAPP-A, AFP, hCG, uE3, and DIA;
sonographer-specific medians used for NT when possible
MoM adjustments: maternal weight, all markers; insulin dependent diabetes,
AFP only
NTD risk: based on AFP MoM
Down syndrome risk: based on maternal age at time of delivery and NT,
PAPP-A, AFP, hCG, uE3, and DIA MoM values
Trisomy 18 risk:
Based on
maternal age and MoM values for PAPP-A, NT, AFP, hCG, and uE3
Based on
maternal age and MoM values for PAPP-A and NT in first part of Sequential
Integrated Screen
CPT
codes*:
-
CPT
codes*:
-
Integrated
and Serum Integrated Screens: 84702, 82105, 84163**, 82677, 86336
-
Sequential
Integrated Screen: 84163** and 84702 (part 1); or 84702, 82105, 82677 and
86336 (part 2)
|
|
| Down syndrome risk |
<1:270 (<1:50 for part 1 of Sequential Integrated
Screen) |
| Trisomy 18 risk |
<1:100 |
| Neural tube defect risk |
<2.50 AFP MoM (singleton pregnancy, no insulin dependent
diabetes) |
|
|
|
Women with a
risk below the cut-off are
considered screen negative and not at increased risk of carrying an affected
fetus. A negative screen does not guarantee the birth of an unaffected baby.
Women with a
risk above the cut-off are considered screen positive and at increased risk
of carrying an affected fetus. Additionally, women who have had
a previously affected pregnancy (Down syndrome, trisomy 18, or NTD) are at
increased risk regardless of the test results. Genetic counseling and
possible diagnostic testing are recommended in all of these cases.
Inaccurate
gestational age and NT measurements can influence risk assessment.
Ultrasound estimation of gestational age is strongly suggested. Risks can be
recalculated if necessary; call 1-866-GENEINFO. |
|
-
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:217-227.
-
Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, McDowell GA: ONTD Working Group. Technical standards
and guidelines: Prenatal screening for open neural tube defects. Genet Med.
2005;7:355-369.
-
Palomaki GE, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA. A summary analysis of Down
syndrome markers in the late first trimester. Adv Clin Chem.
2007;43:177-210.
-
Norem CT, Schoen EJ, Walton DL, et al. Routine ultrasound compared with
maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein for neural tube defect screening. Obstet
Gynecol. 2005;106:747-752.
-
Canick JA, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Palomaki GE, et al; First and Second
Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Trial Research Consortium. Comparison of
serum markers in first-trimester Down syndrome screening. Obstet Gynecol.
2006;108:1192-1199.
-
Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. First and second trimester antenatal
screening for Down’s syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound
Screening Study (SURUSS). J Med Screen. 2003;10:56-104.
-
Palomaki GE, Neveux LM, Knight GJ, Haddow JE. Maternal serum-integrated
screening for trisomy 18 using both first- and second-trimester markers.
Prenatal Diag. 2003;23:243-247.
-
Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, Rudnicka A. SURUSS in perspective. BJOG.
2004;111:521-531.
-
Wald, Rudnicka, Bestwick. Sequential and contingent prenatal screening for
Down syndrome. Prenatal Diag. 2006;26:769-777.
|
 |
|
*The CPT codes provided are based on AMA guidelines and are for informational
purposes only. CPT coding is the sole responsibility of the billing party. Please direct any questions regarding coding to the payor being billed.
**This test is performed using a kit that has not been approved or cleared
by the FDA. The analytical performance characteristics of this test have
been determined by Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute. This test should not
be used for diagnosis without confirmation by other medically established
means. Integrated Test Technology
under license from Intema Ltd, UK |
|
| Content reviewed 10/2009 |
| |
|
 |